Monitoring & Evaluation for South African NPOs: Your Complete Resource Hub
For Non-Profit Organisations in South Africa, demonstrating impact through effective Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is more than a compliance task-it is essential for securing funding and achieving sustainable change. Yet, many NPO leaders are stretched thin, facing pressure from donors and a lack of internal capacity to build the robust systems they need.
This resource hub is your central library for practical guides, tools, and strategic insights. We have compiled everything you need to build a powerful M&E framework from the ground up. Whether you are starting your first Theory of Change or looking to tell more compelling impact stories, these resources are designed to equip you and your team with the skills to succeed.
How to support these free resources
All Monitoring & Evaluation Resources
Frequently Asked Questions on NPO Monitoring & Evaluation
1. How can my NPO start with M&E if we have absolutely no budget?
Starting with M&E does not require a large budget; it requires strategic thinking. The most valuable first step is to develop a Theory of Change with your team, which costs nothing but clarifies your mission and impact pathway. From there, you can identify a few critical outcomes to track. You can then use free, powerful digital tools for data collection. For instance, KoBoToolbox is a free, open-source platform designed for field surveys in areas with poor connectivity, while Google Forms can be used for simple online questionnaires. The initial focus should be on internal learning and improvement, not on creating perfect reports for external parties.
2. We have multiple donors who all want different reports. How do we manage this?
This is a common challenge that can stretch an NPO's capacity. The most effective strategy is to build your M&E system from the inside out. Begin by developing your own internal M&E framework based on your organisation's Theory of Change and core mission objectives. This framework should have its own set of meaningful indicators that you track consistently. When a specific donor requests a report, you then map your internal data onto their required template. This approach ensures your primary focus remains on your strategic goals, rather than creating separate and disjointed M&E systems for every grant.
3. What is the difference between a Theory of Change (ToC) and a Logical Framework (Logframe)?
While often used together, they serve different functions. A Theory of Change is a strategic, narrative-based map that explains the ‘why’ and ‘how’ behind your project, illustrating the causal links that lead to long-term impact. A Logical Framework, or Logframe, is a more rigid project management tool, usually a matrix, that organises your goals, outcomes, outputs, and activities in a structured format. Think of it this way: the ToC is your strategic story, while the Logframe is your operational plan for implementing that story.
4. We are an advocacy organisation. How can we possibly measure our impact?
Measuring advocacy impact is different from measuring service delivery, but it is achievable. Instead of tracking changes in individual beneficiaries, the focus shifts to tracking changes in the policy and public environment. You can develop indicators to track progress along this pathway. Examples include:
Outputs: Number of policy briefs submitted, number of meetings held with policymakers, or amount of media coverage generated.
Outcomes: Documented shifts in a policymaker's public statements, increased positive media sentiment on your issue, or the inclusion of your recommendations in draft legislation.
Impact: The successful passing of a new law or the implementation of a new public policy that aligns with your advocacy goals.
