Services: Data Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

Services: Data Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

Services: Data Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

I build customised systems that capture structured inputs, run workflow automation, and turn messy qualitative or quantitative data into traceable, standards-aligned reporting outputs (with audit trail and data governance built in).

I build customised systems that capture structured inputs, run workflow automation, and turn messy qualitative or quantitative data into traceable, standards-aligned reporting outputs (with audit trail and data governance built in).

I build customised systems that capture structured inputs, run workflow automation, and turn messy qualitative or quantitative data into traceable, standards-aligned reporting outputs (with audit trail and data governance built in).

Proven on policy-scale submission synthesis and donor-aligned research reporting workflows.

Proven on policy-scale submission synthesis and donor-aligned research reporting workflows.

Proven on policy-scale submission synthesis and donor-aligned research reporting workflows.

Who I work with

Who I work with

Abstract black and white wavy lines pattern
Abstract black and white wavy lines pattern

Best fit

Best fit

  • Research and evaluation agencies

  • Policy / management consultancies

  • Donor-funded implementing partners and consortia

  • Government-adjacent units and delivery entities

  • Agencies needing a subcontractor for the data + reporting workstream

  • Research and evaluation agencies

  • Policy / management consultancies

  • Donor-funded implementing partners and consortia

  • Government-adjacent units and delivery entities

  • Agencies needing a subcontractor for the data + reporting workstream

Not a fit

Not a fit

  • Logo / visual identity work

  • Fundraising advisory as a primary need

  • Low-budget “misc marketing support” retainers without system/reporting scope

  • Logo / visual identity work

  • Fundraising advisory as a primary need

  • Low-budget “misc marketing support” retainers without system/reporting scope

Not sure if it’s a fit? Send a brief

Who I work with

Abstract black and white wavy lines pattern

Best fit

  • Research and evaluation agencies

  • Policy / management consultancies

  • Donor-funded implementing partners and consortia

  • Government-adjacent units and delivery entities

  • Agencies needing a subcontractor for the data + reporting workstream

Not a fit

  • Logo / visual identity work

  • Fundraising advisory as a primary need

  • Low-budget “misc marketing support” retainers without system/reporting scope

Not sure if it’s a fit? Send a brief

What you can expect

What you can expect

  • Structured data capture tools (forms / calculators as needed)

  • Clean, standardised databases with a documented data dictionary

  • AI-assisted categorisation and synthesis (with review guardrails)

  • Insight interface (Custom GPT) to query and reuse the evidence base

  • Standards-aligned reporting outputs (tables, summaries, draft sections)

  • Governance built-in: QA checks, versioning, source traceability

  • Handover pack: SOP + training for your team

  • Access control + confidentiality approach (work within your environment where possible)

  • Templates mapped to your required standard (donor / policy / internal format)

  • Structured data capture tools (forms / calculators as needed)

  • Clean, standardised databases with a documented data dictionary

  • AI-assisted categorisation and synthesis (with review guardrails)

  • Insight interface (Custom GPT) to query and reuse the evidence base

  • Standards-aligned reporting outputs (tables, summaries, draft sections)

  • Governance built-in: QA checks, versioning, source traceability

  • Handover pack: SOP + training for your team

  • Access control + confidentiality approach (work within your environment where possible)

  • Templates mapped to your required standard (donor / policy / internal format)

What you can expect

  • Structured data capture tools (forms / calculators as needed)

  • Clean, standardised databases with a documented data dictionary

  • AI-assisted categorisation and synthesis (with review guardrails)

  • Insight interface (Custom GPT) to query and reuse the evidence base

  • Standards-aligned reporting outputs (tables, summaries, draft sections)

  • Governance built-in: QA checks, versioning, source traceability

  • Handover pack: SOP + training for your team

  • Access control + confidentiality approach (work within your environment where possible)

  • Templates mapped to your required standard (donor / policy / internal format)

Abstract Visual that is placed
Abstract Visual that is placed

How it works

How it works

  1. Scoping (objectives, standards, constraints, stakeholders)

  2. System design (data schema, taxonomy, workflow map)

  3. Build (capture tools, database, automations, AI workflows)

  4. QA + traceability (checks, versioning, audit notes)

  5. Handover (SOP + training + recommended next steps)

  1. Scoping (objectives, standards, constraints, stakeholders)

  2. System design (data schema, taxonomy, workflow map)

  3. Build (capture tools, database, automations, AI workflows)

  4. QA + traceability (checks, versioning, audit notes)

  5. Handover (SOP + training + recommended next steps)

Abstract Visual that is placed

How it works

  1. Scoping (objectives, standards, constraints, stakeholders)

  2. System design (data schema, taxonomy, workflow map)

  3. Build (capture tools, database, automations, AI workflows)

  4. QA + traceability (checks, versioning, audit notes)

  5. Handover (SOP + training + recommended next steps)

Relevant case studies

Relevant case studies

Relevant case studies

Service options

Service options

Capture & Automation Engine

Capture & Automation Engine

Capture → compute → route (automated)

Capture → compute → route (automated)

Who it’s for: Teams who need structured intake and automated follow-up.

Who it’s for: Teams who need structured intake and automated follow-up.

Outcomes

Outcomes

  • Clean, standardised inputs from day one

  • Instant scoring / categorisation outputs

  • Automated routing into your tools and comms

  • Clean, standardised inputs from day one

  • Instant scoring / categorisation outputs

  • Automated routing into your tools and comms

Deliverables

Deliverables

  • Framer custom form / calculator component (validation + clear UX)

  • Sheets calculation engine (rules, scoring, flags, outputs)

  • Zapier automations (Sheets, Brevo, CRM, other apps)

  • Admin view + QA checks + handover notes

  • Framer custom form / calculator component (validation + clear UX)

  • Sheets calculation engine (rules, scoring, flags, outputs)

  • Zapier automations (Sheets, Brevo, CRM, other apps)

  • Admin view + QA checks + handover notes

Typical timeline: 2–4 weeks (depending on complexity)

Typical timeline: 2–4 weeks (depending on complexity)

Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

Raw inputs → structured evidence → reporting-ready outputs

Raw inputs → structured evidence → reporting-ready outputs

Who it’s for: Teams drowning in documents, submissions, or messy datasets.

Who it’s for: Teams drowning in documents, submissions, or messy datasets.

Outcomes

Outcomes

  • Faster synthesis and fewer revisions

  • Consistent categorisation across themes

  • Traceable, defensible insights for reporting

  • Faster synthesis and fewer revisions

  • Consistent categorisation across themes

  • Traceable, defensible insights for reporting

Deliverables

Deliverables

  • Data-to-database build + data dictionary

  • AI-assisted extraction / coding workflow + QA checks

  • Insight outputs (synthesis tables, theme summaries, counts where useful)

  • Reporting outputs aligned to required standards / templates

  • Data-to-database build + data dictionary

  • AI-assisted extraction / coding workflow + QA checks

  • Insight outputs (synthesis tables, theme summaries, counts where useful)

  • Reporting outputs aligned to required standards / templates

Typical timeline: 3–8 weeks (based on volume and deliverables)

Typical timeline: 3–8 weeks (based on volume and deliverables)

Insight Copilot (Custom GPT over your evidence base)

Insight Copilot (Custom GPT over your evidence base)

Self-serve insights for your team

Self-serve insights for your team

Who it’s for: Teams that need rapid answers without re-reading everything.

Who it’s for: Teams that need rapid answers without re-reading everything.

Outcomes

Outcomes

  • Faster internal insight generation

  • Better reuse of evidence across workstreams

  • Less dependence on a single analyst

  • Faster internal insight generation

  • Better reuse of evidence across workstreams

  • Less dependence on a single analyst

Deliverables

Deliverables

  • Custom GPT configured around your database + taxonomy

  • Guardrails + “insight recipes” (repeatable queries your team can trust)

  • Light team onboarding

  • Custom GPT configured around your database + taxonomy

  • Guardrails + “insight recipes” (repeatable queries your team can trust)

  • Light team onboarding

Report Writer System (Standards-aligned drafting workflow)

Report Writer System (Standards-aligned drafting workflow)

Drafting workflows that match project standards

Drafting workflows that match project standards

Who it’s for: Research / policy teams with tight reporting cycles and heavy review pressure.

Who it’s for: Research / policy teams with tight reporting cycles and heavy review pressure.

Outcomes

Outcomes

  • Faster draft production

  • Consistent structure and synthesis across sections

  • Clear evidence-to-claim linkage

  • Faster draft production

  • Consistent structure and synthesis across sections

  • Clear evidence-to-claim linkage

Deliverables

Deliverables

  • Report structure aligned to the required template / standard

  • Drafting workflow producing: key findings, synthesis tables, narrative sections

  • Review loop system (human-in-the-loop revision process)

  • Report structure aligned to the required template / standard

  • Drafting workflow producing: key findings, synthesis tables, narrative sections

  • Review loop system (human-in-the-loop revision process)

Service options

Capture & Automation Engine

Capture → compute → route (automated)

Who it’s for: Teams who need structured intake and automated follow-up.

Outcomes

  • Clean, standardised inputs from day one

  • Instant scoring / categorisation outputs

  • Automated routing into your tools and comms

Deliverables

  • Framer custom form / calculator component (validation + clear UX)

  • Sheets calculation engine (rules, scoring, flags, outputs)

  • Zapier automations (Sheets, Brevo, CRM, other apps)

  • Admin view + QA checks + handover notes

Typical timeline: 2–4 weeks (depending on complexity)

Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

Raw inputs → structured evidence → reporting-ready outputs

Who it’s for: Teams drowning in documents, submissions, or messy datasets.

Outcomes

  • Faster synthesis and fewer revisions

  • Consistent categorisation across themes

  • Traceable, defensible insights for reporting

Deliverables

  • Data-to-database build + data dictionary

  • AI-assisted extraction / coding workflow + QA checks

  • Insight outputs (synthesis tables, theme summaries, counts where useful)

  • Reporting outputs aligned to required standards / templates

Typical timeline: 3–8 weeks (based on volume and deliverables)

Insight Copilot (Custom GPT over your evidence base)

Self-serve insights for your team

Who it’s for: Teams that need rapid answers without re-reading everything.

Outcomes

  • Faster internal insight generation

  • Better reuse of evidence across workstreams

  • Less dependence on a single analyst

Deliverables

  • Custom GPT configured around your database + taxonomy

  • Guardrails + “insight recipes” (repeatable queries your team can trust)

  • Light team onboarding

Report Writer System (Standards-aligned drafting workflow)

Drafting workflows that match project standards

Who it’s for: Research / policy teams with tight reporting cycles and heavy review pressure.

Outcomes

  • Faster draft production

  • Consistent structure and synthesis across sections

  • Clear evidence-to-claim linkage

Deliverables

  • Report structure aligned to the required template / standard

  • Drafting workflow producing: key findings, synthesis tables, narrative sections

  • Review loop system (human-in-the-loop revision process)

Best for larger projects: Full Evidence & Reporting System

Best for larger projects: Full Evidence & Reporting System

Best for larger projects: Full Evidence & Reporting System

A complete workflow that runs Capture → Compute → Analyse → Report, designed for traceability, audit trail, and handover-ready documentation.

A complete workflow that runs Capture → Compute → Analyse → Report, designed for traceability, audit trail, and handover-ready documentation.

A complete workflow that runs Capture → Compute → Analyse → Report, designed for traceability, audit trail, and handover-ready documentation.

Deliverables

Deliverables

Deliverables

  • Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

  • Optional Insight Copilot + Report Writer layer depending on scope

  • Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

  • Optional Insight Copilot + Report Writer layer depending on scope

  • Capture & Automation Engine + Evidence, Insight & Reporting Engine

  • Optional Insight Copilot + Report Writer layer depending on scope

Frequently Asked Questions

1) Can you build an ETL pipeline to turn messy inputs into an analysis-ready database?

Yes. I design lightweight ETL pipelines (extract, transform, load) that convert PDFs, forms, spreadsheets, and documents into a clean, structured database. This includes a clear schema, validation rules, and a data dictionary so the evidence base stays consistent over time.

2) Do you do intelligent document processing (IDP) or PDF data extraction for research and policy work?

Yes. When inputs arrive as documents (PDFs, Word files, submissions), I build an intelligent document processing workflow to extract key fields, classify content, and organise it into a searchable evidence base. The goal is faster synthesis without losing traceability back to the original source.

3) Can you create a codebook / coding framework for qualitative analysis so multiple analysts code consistently?

Yes. For qualitative projects, I can design a codebook (coding framework) that defines themes, inclusion/exclusion rules, and examples. This improves inter-coder consistency, makes synthesis easier, and helps teams defend findings in reviews.

4) Do you build RAG / knowledge base chatbots so teams can query internal evidence and documents?

Yes. If you want your team to query an internal evidence base in plain English, I can build a knowledge base chatbot using RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) principles. This helps teams reuse evidence across drafting, reporting, and stakeholder questions without repeatedly searching folders.

5) Can your system produce reporting packs for donor reporting and MEL / M&E reporting cycles?

Yes. I build reporting workflows that generate a reusable reporting pack, including tables, synthesis summaries, and draft-ready sections mapped to your required standard. This is especially useful for donor reporting, MEL systems, and recurring M&E reporting cycles where consistency and auditability matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

1) Can you build an ETL pipeline to turn messy inputs into an analysis-ready database?

Yes. I design lightweight ETL pipelines (extract, transform, load) that convert PDFs, forms, spreadsheets, and documents into a clean, structured database. This includes a clear schema, validation rules, and a data dictionary so the evidence base stays consistent over time.

2) Do you do intelligent document processing (IDP) or PDF data extraction for research and policy work?

Yes. When inputs arrive as documents (PDFs, Word files, submissions), I build an intelligent document processing workflow to extract key fields, classify content, and organise it into a searchable evidence base. The goal is faster synthesis without losing traceability back to the original source.

3) Can you create a codebook / coding framework for qualitative analysis so multiple analysts code consistently?

Yes. For qualitative projects, I can design a codebook (coding framework) that defines themes, inclusion/exclusion rules, and examples. This improves inter-coder consistency, makes synthesis easier, and helps teams defend findings in reviews.

4) Do you build RAG / knowledge base chatbots so teams can query internal evidence and documents?

Yes. If you want your team to query an internal evidence base in plain English, I can build a knowledge base chatbot using RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) principles. This helps teams reuse evidence across drafting, reporting, and stakeholder questions without repeatedly searching folders.

5) Can your system produce reporting packs for donor reporting and MEL / M&E reporting cycles?

Yes. I build reporting workflows that generate a reusable reporting pack, including tables, synthesis summaries, and draft-ready sections mapped to your required standard. This is especially useful for donor reporting, MEL systems, and recurring M&E reporting cycles where consistency and auditability matter.

Frequently Asked Questions

1) Can you build an ETL pipeline to turn messy inputs into an analysis-ready database?

Yes. I design lightweight ETL pipelines (extract, transform, load) that convert PDFs, forms, spreadsheets, and documents into a clean, structured database. This includes a clear schema, validation rules, and a data dictionary so the evidence base stays consistent over time.

2) Do you do intelligent document processing (IDP) or PDF data extraction for research and policy work?

Yes. When inputs arrive as documents (PDFs, Word files, submissions), I build an intelligent document processing workflow to extract key fields, classify content, and organise it into a searchable evidence base. The goal is faster synthesis without losing traceability back to the original source.

3) Can you create a codebook / coding framework for qualitative analysis so multiple analysts code consistently?

Yes. For qualitative projects, I can design a codebook (coding framework) that defines themes, inclusion/exclusion rules, and examples. This improves inter-coder consistency, makes synthesis easier, and helps teams defend findings in reviews.

4) Do you build RAG / knowledge base chatbots so teams can query internal evidence and documents?

Yes. If you want your team to query an internal evidence base in plain English, I can build a knowledge base chatbot using RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) principles. This helps teams reuse evidence across drafting, reporting, and stakeholder questions without repeatedly searching folders.

5) Can your system produce reporting packs for donor reporting and MEL / M&E reporting cycles?

Yes. I build reporting workflows that generate a reusable reporting pack, including tables, synthesis summaries, and draft-ready sections mapped to your required standard. This is especially useful for donor reporting, MEL systems, and recurring M&E reporting cycles where consistency and auditability matter.

Romanos Boraine Consulting Logo

Book a 20-minute scoping call with Romanos

Book a 20-minute scoping call to map your reporting requirements, data reality, and delivery risks. You’ll leave with a recommended scope (Capture Engine, Evidence & Reporting Engine, or full system) and next steps.

Helping agencies, consultancies, and delivery teams turn raw inputs into structured evidence and reporting-ready outputs.

Based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 🇻🇳

© Romanos Boraine 2026.

All Rights Reserved

Romanos Boraine Consulting Logo

Book a 20-minute scoping call with Romanos

Book a 20-minute scoping call to map your reporting requirements, data reality, and delivery risks. You’ll leave with a recommended scope (Capture Engine, Evidence & Reporting Engine, or full system) and next steps.

Helping agencies, consultancies, and delivery teams turn raw inputs into structured evidence and reporting-ready outputs.

Based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 🇻🇳

© Romanos Boraine 2026.

All Rights Reserved

Romanos Boraine Consulting Logo

Book a 20-minute scoping call with Romanos

Book a 20-minute scoping call to map your reporting requirements, data reality, and delivery risks. You’ll leave with a recommended scope (Capture Engine, Evidence & Reporting Engine, or full system) and next steps.

Helping agencies, consultancies, and delivery teams turn raw inputs into structured evidence and reporting-ready outputs.

Based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 🇻🇳

© Romanos Boraine 2026.

All Rights Reserved